Archive for October, 2009

Spoiler Chat With Kristen

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

by Kristin Dos Santos- eonline.com

Here’s a question from this weeks Spoiler Chat.  To view the full article and get answers to questions from all your favorite shows click here.

;) Kelly

Marshall: Any word on True Blood?
We’re going to be meeting up with Anna Paquin, Stephen Moyer and Alexander Skarsgård (get the drool bib) soon, so email any questions to tvdiva@eonline.com. In the meantime: Somebody is going to die next season, and it’ll be a person we’ll be happy to see go, according to Alan Ball. Can we powwow in the comments and figure this one out? I can’t think of anyone whom I want to go, personally. Well, maybe Sookie just cause bitch stole the two best-looking guys on television.

TV Vampire (s)Takedown

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

By Arthur Smith- paleycenter.org

Vampire Poll

Who Is the Greatest TV Vampire of Them All? (vote for one)

Who Is the Greatest TV Vampire of Them All?

We are currently in the midst of an explosion in the popularity of vampires, with the Twilight movie franchise and HBO’s gothic soap True Blood leading the undead charge—suddenly, it seems, audiences want blood. Why now? Is it the parlous state of the world, economic anxieties, the end result of a morbidly sex-and-youth obsessed popular culture? It’s a pop-culture phenomenon that Entertainment Weekly has been following closely. Here’s Tina Jordan, senior editor at EW:

Though vampires have been the object of fascination for centuries, there’s been perhaps no culture as besotted with them as ours. An ongoing love for Dracula movies—whether they were cheesy or scary, whether they starred Bela Lugosi, George Hamilton, or Klaus Kinski—was first stoked in the mid-1970s, when both Stephen King’s Salem’s Lot and Anne Rice’s Interview with the Vampire came out. Then came the subsequent movie versions of those books, and the blockbuster success of TV shows like Buffy and Angel. But it wasn’t until Stephenie Meyer came along, corralling tens of millions of teenagers (and their mothers and grandmothers!) into bookstores and movie theatres that we became a nation obsessed. Now, thanks not only to Twilight but to authors like P.C. and Kristin Cast, Charlaine Harris, and Laurell K. Hamilton, as well as to hit shows like True Blood and The Vampire Diaries, it’s clear that most of us have succumbed to the lure of the sexy undead.

As Jordan points out, our current infatuation with bloodsuckers is just the most recent iteration of the enduring appeal of these dark avatars; our fascination with the vampire never really dies, though it goes underground from time to time. Here we present a brief survey of vamps from the small screen, encompassing interpretations that range from the repulsively horrific to the seductively suave. We even have vampires for children, who, of course, like to be safely scared too.

We’d like to hear from you: What accounts for our love of the undead? Do you like your vampires scary, sexy, or a mixture of both? Does each era get the vampire it deserves? And what’s the deal with garlic, anyway?

Place your vote for TV’s all-time greatest undead bloodsucker—that’s TV, so no Edward Cullen or Lestat.

If we’ve missed your favorite, write-in votes are welcome.

Vampire Poll

Who Is the Greatest TV Vampire of Them All? (vote for one)

  • Angel
    (1997 to 2004)
    Angel and Spike: A sort of male vampiric Betty and Veronica: Buffy the Vampire Slayer‘s dark, brooding, sensitive Angel and blonde, wicked, bad boy Spike sent Buffy’s hormones racing and sparked endless fan debate over the which was the groovier ghoulie. Must a girl choose? Warning: Angel turns evil after sex, and Spike writes bad poetry. Pick your poison.

Barnabas Collins
(1966 to 1971)
Dark Shadows’ resident vamp was in the classic style, and actor Jonathan Frid’s lovelorn performance made the gothic soap a cultural phenomenon. Barnabas was simultaneously romantic and cruel, a potent combination that had female viewers swooning over their bon bons during his late sixties run.

  • Bill Compton
    (2008 to present)
    Bill Compton and Eric Northman: A sort of male vampiric Betty and Veronica: True Blood’s dark, brooding, sensitive Bill and blonde, wicked, bad boy Eric sent Sookie Stackhouse’s hormones racing and sparked endless fan debate over which was the groovier ghoulie. Must a girl choose? Warning: Bill has a terrifying singing voice, and Eric spends most of his time in a tacky bar glaring at people. Pick your poison.

  • The Count
    (1972 to present)
    Why do they call him The Count? Because he loves to count! Sesame Street’s most elegant muppet, Count Von Count, substitutes bloodlust with a mania for tabulation—a bit perplexing, really, but he gets style points for the monocle and the best evil laugh ever. Ha ha ha ha ha! (After reports that his laugh, accompanied by crashing thunder, scared small children, Sesame Street has toned down the Count’s spookier attributes.)

  • Count Chocula
    (1971 to present)
    The most delicious of the monster cereals? Certainly more recherché than the sickly sweet Franken Berry, but our favorites are actually the piquant Boo Berry and the vanishingly rare Fruit Brute. Still, as far as vampire-themed cereal mascots go, Chocula is clearly the man to beat.

     

     

  • Count Floyd
    (1976 to 1984)
    Joe Flaherty’s SCTV newsman Floyd Robertson, the serious, competent foil to Eugene Levy’s hapless coanchor Earl Camembert, moonlighted as the vampire-themed host of the fictitious network’s cheesy late-night horror program “Monster Horror Chiller Theater.” Floyd’s zany howls of terror, sweaty pleas for the kids to send in money for 3-D glasses, and desperate catchphrase “wasn’t that scary?” (the movies were inevitably, pathetically poor) all indicated Robertson’s well-documented drinking problem held sway in the wee hours of a long broadcasting day. Count Floyd wasn’t scary in a traditional sense, but his very existence—was Robertson forced to take this gig to pay for rehab and alimony?—was sad and disturbing. And hilarious.

  • Eric Northman
    (2008 to present)
    See Bill Compton.

     

     

     

  • Darla
    (1998 to 2004)
    The delightful distaff vamps of Buffy the Vampire Slayer also came in a blonde-n-brunette duo: Darla, a classic icy femme fatale, and Dru, crazier than an acre of snakes. Beautiful, perverse, funny, and dangerous, these cold-blooded hotties inspired many daydreams of the ultimate hickey.

     

  • Drusilla
    (1998 to 2004)
    See Darla.

     

     

     

  • Julian Luna
    (1996)
    Kindred: The Embraced was a short-lived series, but its premise—a series of highly variable vampire clans participate in an elaborate “Masquerade” to live among humans—was intriguing; it was sort of The West Wing of vampire shows, with Mark Frankel’s Prince Julian more of a harried bureaucrat than romantic monster. 

     

  • Kurt Barlow
    (1979)
    Stephen King’s 1970s miniseries Salem’s Lot deviated from the sexy/suave vampire model to horrifying effect. The vampire’s manservant, Straker, as played by iconic British actor James Mason, provided the continental charm and patrician bearing normally associated with the traditional children of the night; Barlow, the vampire proper, harked back to the rodent-like, repulsively terrifying Nosferatu of Murnau’s classic silent film. Barlow was an indelible image of horror, and occupied the heart of one of television’s most genuinely frightening vampire tales.

  • Mick St. John
    (2007 to 2008)
    Moonlight’s eternal wanderer Mick St. John solved crimes and helped people with their personal problems in this demonic take on Highway to Heaven. Sadly, Moonlight’s ratings took a highway to a more southerly location.

     

     

  • Janos Skorzeny
    (1972)
    Kolchak: The Night Stalker was a precursor to The X-Files (which was a precursor to Fringe, for our younger readers), a supernaturally themed thriller program whose eponymous investigative reporter covered the freaky beat. In the first Kolchak outing, our hero tracks Janos Skorzeny, a serial killer, who turns out to be a vampire. In one tense scene, Kolchak confronts Skorzeny in a hospital, where the vamp is stealing blood. Kolchak proved that vampires could be viable and scary in a completely contemporary, banal setting, a notion that has inspired many subsequent chroniclers of the undead.

  • Spike
    (1997 to 2004)
    See Angel.

     

     

    Damon Salvatore
    (2009 to present)
    The Vampire Diaries brings us the garlic-abjuring brotherly duo of Stefan and Damon Salvatore, a couple of nice, clean-cut all American boys with creepy powers and cheekbones for miles. It’s nice to see Lost’s Boon back from the dead, though his attitude has taken a nasty turn.

     

  • Stefan Salvatore
    (2009 to present)
    See Damon Salvatore.

     

     

 To vote click here.

Sink Your Teeth Into True Blood Scoop!–Possible Spoilers

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

This interview with Alan Ball was originally published on TV Guide Magazine’s website.

After a wildly successful second season, True Blood executive producer Alan Ball says he and the cast and crew are already sinking their teeth into Season 3, promising that the sexy vampire thriller “just stays big and weird and fun.”

“After last season you would think things would sort of return to normal – but no, that’s not going to happen!” Ball told TV Guide Magazine. “No, there’s just as much weird stuff out there, and we’re going to meet some werewolves for the first time; we’re going to find out some roles vampires played in history, which is interesting and shocking and funny. It’s more of the same.”

I am looking at pictures of locations and looking at models of new sets and stuff, so we’re back,” said Ball. “I have four scripts that I am going, four first drafts, and I’m going over them and making some revisions with the writing staff, and we’ve already cast a major role: the vampire king of Mississippi, who’s going to be played by Dennis O’Hare, which I’m very, very excited about.” O’Hare’s a Tony-, Obie- and Drama Desk Award-winning actor best known to television audiences for his recurring role as Travis March on Brothers & Sisters.

While the rollercoaster relationship of Sookie Stackhouse (Anna Paquin) and Bill Compton (Stephen Moyer) remains front and center, Ball revealed that several supporting characters will be sharing even more of the spotlight. “Definitely Eric has broken out and is a big important character now. Jessica and Hoyt are still trying to deal with everything that happened to them, and Arlene and Terry are going to have a little bit more of a life and more of a presence on the show.”

There’s also room for guest stars, like Evan Rachel Wood’s vampire queen of Louisiana. “She’ll be back,” promised Ball. “Maybe Zeljko Ivanek, who played the Magister in Season 1 – he might be back. And we do have a lot of fun new characters.”

Sam Trammell, who plays the hapless but heroic bar owner/changeling Sam Merlotte, added that Season 3 is “going to explore my relatives and the sort of sketchy, shapeshifter-y people in my family, and that’s going to be more torture for Sam. I’m sure they’re not going to be good people.” But will Sam’s still-burning torch for Sookie also be a source of torment? “Well, I hope he still has a shot with Sookie, but who knows? Probably not.”

Trammell said that the wildly enthusiastic response to Season 2 has left the actors “psyched” to return to work on Dec. 3. “We couldn’t believe the numbers that we got,” he said. “We were just sort of stunned. Yeah, we were kind of working in a bubble for most of last year and certainly year one, because it hadn’t come out. And now we know that people are really into it and on board, so we’re psyched to see they’ve written.”

The creative team hasn’t been overly stressed out about topping the all-out mayhem of Season 2. “We have a great head start in that we have these fantastic books that Charlaine Harris wrote,” said Ball. “It’s not like we have a blank slate and say ‘Oh my God, what are we going to do?’ So we’re using book three as the model for Season 3. And there’s nine of them and she publishes one every year, so I feel like ‘Just keep ‘em comin’.’

And while Ball admits he felt a twinge of worry when he found out about the real-life romance between stars Paquin and Moyer, he’s thrilled that the couple is rock-solid now that they’re engaged.

“When I first found out I was like ‘Uh-oh – no!’” he laughed. “But by now it’s very clear that it’s the real deal and they’re very, very happy. Anna said to me at a party, after I said ‘You look fantastic,’ she said ‘Well, I’m happy, and happier than I’ve ever been in my life and a lot of it is thanks to you.’ It’s great to know that. I just want everybody working on the show to be happy, and so far they are.

Anna Paquin on Graham Norton Show

Monday, October 12th, 2009

New-age vampires thirst for love rather than blood

Sunday, October 11th, 2009

 

By Stacy Foster- dailyorange.com

Vampires have recently taken a bite out of the entertainment industry. The infamously fanged characters have appeared in literature, film, television and theater.

Even director Tim Burton, who notoriously shies away from mainstream phenomena, is getting a taste of vampire success with his upcoming movie adaptation of “Dark Shadows,” a classic vampire television show.

The newly revived vampire movement has hit quick. The Season 2 premiere of “True Blood” was the most watched HBO show since “The Sopranos” series finale in June of 2007, reported TVWeek. The show chronicles the small-town romance between a telepathic waitress played by Anna Paquin and a vampire played by Stephen Moyer.

The show’s instant success is just one of the many indications that vampires are out for blood in mainstream popular culture. The pending release of “New Moon,” the second movie in the “Twilight” series, already has vampire fanatics staking their claims on the midnight showing. According to Fandango, 50 locations have already sold out tickets for the highly anticipated vampire flick, and the movie doesn’t premiere until Nov. 20.

The “Twilight” saga catapulted the most recent vampire renaissance, but in reality, these blood-drinking day walkers have always made good entertainment. Warner Brothers television shows “Buffy The Vampire Slayer” and “Angel,” dominated late 90′s television. Even before them, “Interview with a Vampire: The Vampire Chronicles,” and other novels by Anne Rice captivated readers with her combination of terror and sadness and were eventually adapted into popular films.

What’s changed between new vampire culture and that of Anne Rice is that new literature and entertainment allows vampires to been seen in a softer light. In Rice’s “Interview with a Vampire,” written in 1973, the main character Lestat chooses to live his life eternally as a vampire. After he has made his decision he is forced to live a solitary and lacking that life forever. Similarly the show “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” based on the premises that the blood-thirsty creatures are evil. Buffy, played by Sarah Michelle Gellar, is the only person innately capable of killing vampires who are dangerous to mankind.

Now “Twilight” and “Vampire Diaries” introduce both heroic and villainous elements to the typical vampire character. Edward Cullen’s untainted love for Bella Swan never falters despite his drug-like addiction to her blood. Still, Meyer juxtaposes the goodness of Edward with the evil that is the rest of the vampire world. “Vampire Diaries’” hero, Stefan, also doesn’t drink human blood but struggles with his desires to satisfy himself in a way that would make him ultimately evil. Things like blood typing in biology and an open wound commonly plague the vampire-gone-good, but in recent vampire-lit, more often than not, the vampire resists.

Vampires now have a chance at romance and love. They are no longer innately evil. Rather, they are good or evil based on their own decisions. The new take on vampires allows interaction between the cold ones and their human opposites. Instead of underground lairs and in-home coffins, vampires are now lurking in high schools and Louisiana bars.

The tension between a vampire’s thirst and his desire to fit into the human world simply makes good entertainment. Sexy vampires like Robert Pattinson and Kellan Lutz certainly lure me in.

True Blood Executive Producer: Someone Will Die

Sunday, October 11th, 2009
  • by Natalie Abrams- tvguide.com 
  • We’ll be saying goodbye to at least one character next season on True Blood, executive producer Alan Ball tells TVGuide.com exclusively. “Somebody is going to bite the dust and it’s going to be really good to see them get what they deserve,” Ball says. HBO: True Blood renewed for third season The only clue the Blood boss would reveal is that “it’s a person we’ll be happy to see go.” The HBO drama is set to return next summer for its third season. So who could this mystery person be? Who’s death will actually make the fans happy? Sound off in the comments.

    ‘True Blood’ boosts Charlaine Harris’ starpower

    Friday, October 9th, 2009

    by Brian Truitt- usaweekend.com

    Trueblood09_64

    Even if you’ve faithfully watched both seasons of HBO’s hit vampire series True Blood, based on Charlaine Harris‘ Sookie Stackhouse novels, you’ve only seen a glimpse into the writer’s colorful world. And keen TV watchers finally got to see the author on screen with her creations — she had a cameo in a bar scene during True Blood’s season finale last month. Long before Anna Paquin put on the Merlotte’s waitress uniform as the on-screen Sookie, Harris introduced the spunky Louisiana telepath in the 2001 novel Dead Until Dark. Many vampires, werewolves, shapeshifters and a fairy godmother later, her series is going strong, with a new short-story compilation A Touch of Dead in stores this week and the 11th Sookie novel, Dead in the Family, scheduled for a May release. In addition, the fourth book in her Harper Connelly Mysteries series, Grave Secret, comes out next month (read the first chapter here), and later this month Harris, 58, will be the official queen of New Orleans’ annual Vampire Ball. I caught up with the Arkansas-based author recently for an upcoming cover story about vampires, but read below about how Harris got into writing about the supernatural and what she thinks the next big thing involving the undead will be.

    Photos courtesy of HBO, Ace Publishing

     

    Trueblood09_33 Your books were already popular by themselves, but they’ve seemed to have taken on a whole new life thanks to True Blood.
    Yeah, I’ve gained a whole new group of readers, which has been of course wonderful. But the new readers seem to see the books in a different light than the readers I had before. They see the characters on television, and I think sometimes they wonder why the characters in the books aren’t cooperating more with the ones on the screen.

    Dead Until Dark was your first book delving into the supernatural. Did you automatically take to the genre?
    I loved it and I thought it was a really strong book, but it took my agent a very long time to sell it – longer than any other I’ve written. It took two years for him to place that book.

    Was that just because of the time?
    It was timing, and it was because people didn’t expect it from me. Of course, my agent submitted it to editors who had known me in the past, and they were going, “What the hell?! This is really different!” [Laughs.] And it’s partly because people really didn’t know how to market something like that then. Urban fantasy has boomed since then, but then people were going, “It’s not a mystery, it’s not horror, it’s not romance – where are we going to put it?” And that’s a huge problem for chain bookstores.

    When you go back the other way, and deal with things not involving graves and vampires, will you have the opposite problem?
    Maybe. But right now, I’m in the fortunate position of being pretty sellable.

    Are you a fan of horror movies and that sort of thing?
    Oh no no. I don’t watch horror movies at all – well, I don’t watch bloody horror movies, let me put it that way. I’m not really interested in people cutting off their hands and legs or being eviscerated. I’m more interested in the psychology. I was always interested in the weird, the macabre, the strange, the unusual, but I write conventional stuff until I reached a certain point in my life when I thought, “If I’m gonna do something different, now has to be the time.”

    37943036 A Touch of Dead features Sookie short stories. For you, how does that format compare with writing a novel?
    It’s flexing a different muscle. It can be fun to do stories that you could not do as part of a bigger book, and it’s also a chance to make some points that you don’t get to make in a longer format. I’ve written some that weren’t Sookies that were definitely a lot of fun for me to write because they were so different, like the one that was in the Horror Writers of America anthology. I had to join Horror Writers of America to put the story in there, but that’s OK. It’s called An Evening with Al Gore, and it was just a lot of fun to write something from a different point of view with different characters and get the ecological point in there. It’s always fun doing something different.

    Vampires are having their day right now, but do you have any insight on what will be next? Werewolves? Mad scientists?
    A lot of people think zombies, which can be amusing. Max BrooksWorld War Z is just a wonderful book, I love it. But I’m thinking now, how much can you do with zombies? They’re rotting! [Laughs] That’s just not attractive. I just can’t get into it. When you’re talking about rotting flesh, there’s just so much you can do! Even if you’ve faithfully watched both seasons of HBO’s hit vampire series True Blood, based on Charlaine Harris‘ Sookie Stackhouse novels, you’ve only seen a glimpse into the writer’s colorful world. And keen TV watchers finally got to see the author on screen with her creations — she had a cameo in a bar scene during True Blood’s season finale last month. Long before Anna Paquin put on the Merlotte’s waitress uniform as the on-screen Sookie, Harris introduced the spunky Louisiana telepath in the 2001 novel Dead Until Dark. Many vampires, werewolves, shapeshifters and a fairy godmother later, her series is going strong, with a new short-story compilation A Touch of Dead in stores this week and the 11th Sookie novel, Dead in the Family, scheduled for a May release. In addition, the fourth book in her Harper Connelly Mysteries series, Grave Secret, comes out next month (read the first chapter here), and later this month Harris, 58, will be the official queen of New Orleans’ annual Vampire Ball. I caught up with the Arkansas-based author recently for an upcoming cover story about vampires, but read below about how Harris got into writing about the supernatural and what she thinks the next big thing involving the undead will be.

     

     Your books were already popular by themselves, but they’ve seemed to have taken on a whole new life thanks to True Blood.
    Yeah, I’ve gained a whole new group of readers, which has been of course wonderful. But the new readers seem to see the books in a different light than the readers I had before. They see the characters on television, and I think sometimes they wonder why the characters in the books aren’t cooperating more with the ones on the screen.

    Dead Until Dark was your first book delving into the supernatural. Did you automatically take to the genre?
    I loved it and I thought it was a really strong book, but it took my agent a very long time to sell it – longer than any other I’ve written. It took two years for him to place that book.

    Was that just because of the time?
    It was timing, and it was because people didn’t expect it from me. Of course, my agent submitted it to editors who had known me in the past, and they were going, “What the hell?! This is really different!” [Laughs.] And it’s partly because people really didn’t know how to market something like that then. Urban fantasy has boomed since then, but then people were going, “It’s not a mystery, it’s not horror, it’s not romance – where are we going to put it?” And that’s a huge problem for chain bookstores.

    When you go back the other way, and deal with things not involving graves and vampires, will you have the opposite problem?
    Maybe. But right now, I’m in the fortunate position of being pretty sellable.

    Are you a fan of horror movies and that sort of thing?
    Oh no no. I don’t watch horror movies at all – well, I don’t watch bloody horror movies, let me put it that way. I’m not really interested in people cutting off their hands and legs or being eviscerated. I’m more interested in the psychology. I was always interested in the weird, the macabre, the strange, the unusual, but I write conventional stuff until I reached a certain point in my life when I thought, “If I’m gonna do something different, now has to be the time.”

    A Touch of Dead features Sookie short stories. For you, how does that format compare with writing a novel? 
    It’s flexing a different muscle. It can be fun to do stories that you could not do as part of a bigger book, and it’s also a chance to make some points that you don’t get to make in a longer format. I’ve written some that weren’t Sookies that were definitely a lot of fun for me to write because they were so different, like the one that was in the Horror Writers of America anthology. I had to join Horror Writers of America to put the story in there, but that’s OK. It’s called An Evening with Al Gore, and it was just a lot of fun to write something from a different point of view with different characters and get the ecological point in there. It’s always fun doing something different.

    Vampires are having their day right now, but do you have any insight on what will be next? Werewolves? Mad scientists?
    A lot of people think zombies, which can be amusing. Max BrooksWorld War Z is just a wonderful book, I love it. But I’m thinking now, how much can you do with zombies? They’re rotting! [Laughs] That’s just not attractive. I just can’t get into it. When you’re talking about rotting flesh, there’s just so much you can do!

    ‘True Blood’ Star Rutina Wesley Sees ‘Grief’ And ‘More Darkness’ For Tara In Season 3

    Friday, October 9th, 2009

    by Amy Wilkinson- hollywoodcrush.mtv.com

    Movie TrailersMovies Blog

    When we heard last month that “True Blood” hottie Mehcad Brooks had been cast as a lawyer on ABC’s midseason replacement “The Deep End,” we wondered whether his character Eggs would be scrambled by Maryann. Well, we were partially right. The 28-year-old fell victim to a bullet in the season finale, though it was at the hands of well-meaning Jason Stackhouse.

    As sad as we are to see Mehcad (and his abs) depart “True Blood,” we’re sure gal pal Tara Thornton is even more torn up. MTV News caught up with the actress who portrays prickly Tara (Rutina Wesley) at the premiere of Jude Law’s “Hamlet” (read our rundown of hot Hamlets here), and she talked about what’s next for Tara.

    “I’m sure she’s going to have some grieving to do, losing Maryann and Eggs—the love of her life, I think,” Rutina theorized. “I don’t know how Tara is really going to react to that. I see some grief. I see some more darkness.”

     

    As evil as maenad Maryann was, it’s easy to forget that Tara relied on her as a mother figure in place of her own often-drunk mom, making her death nearly as devastating as Eggs’. Though Rutina said that Tara will likely find solace in recently returned BFF Sookie (Anna Paquin), we’re hoping there’s a juicier resolution—namely Tara turning to one-time crush Jason (Ryan Kwanten). Wouldn’t that be ironic?

    What do you think will happen to Tara in the third season of “True Blood”?

    Talking Shop: Stephen Moyer

    Friday, October 9th, 2009

    Kev Geoghegan- bbc.co.uk

    Stephen Moyer is the latest British actor to take US television by storm as vampire good guy Bill Compton in the hit show True Blood, which starts on Channel 4 later.

    Stephen Moyer
    Moyer has played a vampire once before for a BBC show

    With his flawless southern-US drawl and chiselled Hollywood good looks, it is a surprise that the 39-year-old hails from Essex, far from the fictional swampy Louisiana town of Bon Temps.

    In the show, vampires have been drawn into the open after the invention of a new synthetic human blood substitute called True Blood.

    Moyer’s character – an American civil war soldier who turned vamp in 1868 – begins a love affair with telepathic waitress Sookie Stackhouse, played by Anna Paquin.

    He is now engaged to his co-star who, in 1994 at the age of 11, became one of the youngest Oscar winners in history for her performance in The Piano.

     


    The show has been a huge hit in the US already. Are your American fans still surprised when they meet you and hear your English accent?

    However much press that Hugh Laurie does and however many interviews they see him sounding English, when they meet him in the street, they still can’t believe it and that’s the reaction I get.

    It’s lovely for me, you know, I have dark hair in the show and I’m pale and I have the dark sideburns so it’s like a whole costume by itself. It’s very enjoyable.

    I would ask how exciting it was to be play a vampire, but you’ve already played one in the Channel 4 series Ultraviolet. Did that make it easier the second time around?

    Well, the character I played in Ultraviolet loved being a vampire and the character this time is somebody who struggles with it. He struggles with the fact that he has to feed on humans.

    He’s trying to live a decent life and is very conflicted and tortured which is great fun to play.

    True Blood
    The cast is about to begin filming the third season of True Blood

    At the moment, most vampires seem to be brooding and self-loathing – don’t you miss the gleefully evil, sexy vamps who enjoy drinking the blood of young virgins?

    Oh, there’s plenty of them in our show. And as we get deeper into the show, we get to meet those vampires that you’re talking about . And Bill, for all his attempts at being a decent – for want of a better word, human – is conflicted and he won’t prey on the innocent.

    But he’s quite happy to find people who cause pain to Sookie and if he finds them, he will take them down.

    There are quite a few parallels in the story with, for example, the American civil rights struggle. Many vampires are just looking for social acceptance.

    Definitely, as soon as you get told that Alan Ball [Oscar-winning writer of American Beauty and Six Feet Under] is involved, you have to take it a bit more seriously. It’s not going to be just some camp romp, although there is some of that.

    But when I read it, I saw parallels between segregation between black and white and the issue of homosexuality and any minority that you want to bring to the table. Bill has gone through such pain and has lost his wife and children and you really do feel for him.

    Do you have a favourite portrayal of a vampire – who is the definitive bloodsucker?

    For me , the original Nosferatu is just so compelling and dark and weird. Our fascination with vampires didn’t really start until after that and they made the vampire attractive.

    I’m a massive fan of Gary Oldman and I also love Hammer and the new Swedish movie, Let The Right One In, was an extraordinary film.

    There’s a current revived interest in vampires which has surely helped True Blood’s success. On the flipside, are you worried that people will start to tire of the craze?

    You do think when will the zeitgeist end and when will people stop being interested, but I think that Alan has created so many ideas within our show.

    The second season has already gone out in America and it was even bigger than the first season so there’s going to be werewolves, there’s going to be other supernatural characters.

    Ultimately it’s just a framework for telling a story. Our show isn’t really about vampires, it’s about human relationships and how people interact with each other.

    Anna Pacquin
    Paquin’s character is initially ostracised for her relationship with Bill

    You met your new fiancee on the show. Do you find it hard to switch off when you go home for the day?

    We both love the show, Anna and I, and if we have a scene coming up, maybe we feel that we’ve seen before, we’ll try and do it in a different way and we’ll talk about work then. We always try and make it fresh, but when we’ve done that – it just becomes about life, not vampires any more. We met on set, everyone knows us on set and as a couple, but that’s really where it stops.

    You celebrate your 40th birthday later this week, have you got a big party planned?

    I’ve got a bunch of friends coming out to a country house that I have rented for the weekend and we are going to make merry.

    We’ve got an Indian Elvis playing and we’ve got some children’s entertainers and it’s going to be a riot.

    I’m sure my ‘hilarious’ friends will be doing something with comedy teeth.

    The work in progress…

    Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

    Beyond the Coffin

    Are we missing anything?

    ~M.